
Two claims filed from the city in 2018 after a town plow truck struck a privately owned pickup truck have been dismissed, but a key piece of the circumstance has nonetheless to be determined.
The lawsuit was at first filed in February 2019 after a pickup truck driven by Mark Moll, who was operating for Lynn Growth Inc., was hit by a Jamestown snowplow at 3:43 a.m. March 2, 2018. Moll alleges plow driver William Griffith sped through a cease sign at Marion Road and Foote Avenue and strike the truck Moll was driving.
A recognize of claim was submitted in Might 2018 from the metropolis, but the declare wasn’t settled inside the 30-working day window involved in the state Typical Municipal Law, prompting a lawsuit in condition Supreme Court docket in Mayville.
ARGUMENTS
Michael Coutu, an lawyer from Lewis & Lewis P.C. representing Moll, wrote in a court docket submitting that Moll had suffered existence-altering injuries that essential 4 spinal surgeries that rendered Moll disabled. Coutu argued the metropolis should really be held liable for the incident due to the fact it assigned an inexperienced driver to the plow route with inadequate teaching that the plow driver hadn’t operated the plow properly down Marion Street’s steep grade that the driver hadn’t blown his horn to notify Moll that the plow truck was approaching and that it was probably the plow driver experienced not been offered a 10-hour rest time period as expected beneath Federal Motor Carrier Protection Administration procedures. Coutu also mentioned the plow truck was 1 of the city’s oldest plow vans at the time and had the fewest security capabilities of automobiles on the city’s fleet.
“Simply place, as in Bliss, Holmes and Campbell and the other scenarios, the history is replete with proof from which a trier of truth can rationally conclude that the defendants acted with reckless disregard for the safety of other individuals top to the crash at Marion and Foote Avenue,” Coutu wrote in a memorandum of law submitted to condition Supreme Court docket. “This contains the non-party witness affirmation describing his observations of the crash and conduct of the defendant’s plow operator and the specialist reconstruction affidavit establishing additional proof of the defendant’s acts which taken together present a aware disregard for the security of some others building the hazard of harn if not inescapable, at the very least, really possible. For this motive as nicely the defendants’ motion need to be denied.”
Marina Murray, an lawyer from the Sugarman Law Organization LLP symbolizing the metropolis, argued that promises the plow truck sped via the Marion Road/Foote Avenue intersection cannot be verified when Griffith testified he would not have pushed speedier than 15 miles an hour that early morning and was driving involving 5 and 10 miles an hour when the plow truck started to slide by means of the intersection. Griffith also testified he experienced been given the relaxation suggested by federal law although Patrick Monaghan, city fleet manager, testified the plow truck’s devices were being in good doing the job get prior to the incident.
“First, in the course of their opposition, Plaintiffs argue that Mr. Griffith ‘failed to end at and sped by way of a stop signal at the intersection of Marion Avenue and Foote Avenue,’ suggesting that Mr. Griffith intentionally drove into the intersection,” Murray wrote in a memorandum of law submitted to condition Supreme Court. “There is practically nothing in the record to help this competition. Mr. Griffith was not able to deliver the plow truck to a entire end at the quit indicator due to the fact of the icy affliction of the road, triggering his plow to slide by means of the intersection. In reality, as Mr. Griffith was driving down Marion Road, he was feathering the plow’s brakes and performing ‘everything he could’ to attempt and carry his plow truck to a finish cease at the halt sign.”
State Supreme Courtroom Choose Lynn Keane sided with Moll in March 2021, denying the city’s motion to dismiss the circumstance and buying the parties to file motions for summary judgement minimal to the concern of “serious injury” as outlined by condition insurance policies legislation. The significant personal injury judgement has still to be made the decision.
CITY’S Appeal
The city appealed soon right after Keane’s determination to the Fourth Department Appellate Division, which dominated in early August that promises of negligent choosing, coaching and supervision should really be dismissed together with a claim of negligent entrustment while also ruling the city experienced not proven that Griffith wasn’t running the plow truck with reckless disregard for the security of other folks.
“Here, defendants’ submissions established that Griffith had prior knowledge driving a snowplow and, for a number of weeks soon after Griffith was hired by the DPW, he was educated by an seasoned snowplow driver by means of a schooling system delivered by the metropolis, all through which Griffith noticed and emulated the professional driver’s methods. Even further, Griffith did not have a inadequate driving record, he had a business driver’s license and he beforehand was utilized by the point out of New York as a snowplow driver. We consequently conclude that defendants met their prima facie load for summary judgement with respect to the negligent entrustment claim.”








More Stories
Injured in a Truck Accident? Trust Our Roseville Attorneys for Justice!
Questions to Ponder Before Hiring a Truck Accident Lawyer
One Dead After Fuel Tanker Explosion on Connecticut I-95 Bridge